⑩ 로널드 레이건의 공산주의 몰락 예견 <下>
영어로 읽는 세기의 名연설

⑩ 로널드 레이건의 공산주의 몰락 예견 <下>

오춘호 기자2009.06.30읽기 15원문 보기
#로널드 레이건#공산주의 몰락#소련#민주주의#자유#독재#자결권#언론의 자유

Free people,worthy of freedom and determined not only to remain so but to help others gain their freedom as well.☞ 지난호에서 계속 We cannot ignore the fact that even without our encouragement there has been and will continue to be repeated explosion against repression and dictatorships.The Soviet Union itself is not immune to this reality.Any system is

inherently unstable that has no peaceful means to legitimize its leaders.In such cases,the very repressiveness of the state ultimately drives people to resist it,if necessary,by force.While we must be cautious about forcing the pace of change,we must not hesitate to declare our ultimate objectives and to take concrete actions to move toward them.We

must be ①staunch in our conviction that freedom is not the sole ②prerogative of a lucky few but the inalienable and universal right of all human beings.So states the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights,which,among other things,guarantees free elections.The objective I propose is quite simple to state: to foster the infrastructure

of democracy,the system of a free press,unions,political parties,universities,which allows a people to choose their own way to develop their own culture,to reconcile their own differences through peaceful means.This is not cultural imperialism:it is providing the means for genuine self-determination and protection for diversity.Democracy already fl

ourishes in countries with very different cultures and historical experiences.It would be cultural ③condescension,or worse,to say that any people prefer dictatorship to democracy.Who would voluntarily choose not to have the right to vote,decide to purchase government propaganda handouts instead of independent newspapers,prefer government to worker-

controlled unions,opt for land to be owned by the state instead of those who ④till it,want government repression of religious liberty,a single political party instead of a free choice,a rigid cultural orthodoxy instead of democratic tolerance and diversity.Since 1917 the Soviet Union has given covert political training and assistance to Marxist-Len

inists in many countries.Of course, it also has promoted the use of violence and subversion by these same forces.Over the past several decades,West European and other social democrats,Christian democrats,and leaders have offered open assistance to fraternal,political,and social institutions to bring about peaceful and democratic progress.Appropriat

ely,for a vigorous new democracy,the Federal Republic of Germany's political foundations have become a major force in this effort.We in America now intend to take additional steps,as many of our allies have already done,toward realizing this same goal.The chairmen and other leaders of the national Republican and Democratic party organizations are i

nitiating a study with the bipartisan American Political Foundation to determine how the United States can best contribute as a nation to the global campaign for democracy now gathering force.They will have the cooperation of congressional leaders of both parties,along with representatives of business,labor,and other major institutions in our socie

ty.I look forward to receiving their recommendations and to working with these institutions and the Congress in the common task of strengthening democracy throughout the world.It is time that we committed ourselves as a nation -- in both the public and private sectors -- to assisting democratic development....What I am describing now is a plan and

a hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and ⑤muzzle the self-expression of the people.And that's why we must continue our efforts to strengthen NATO even as we move forward with our zero-option initiative in th

e negotiations on intermediate-range forces and our proposal for a one-third reduction in strategic ballistic missile warheads.Our military strength is a prerequisite to peace,but let it be clear we maintain this strength in the hope it will never be used,for the ultimate determinant in the struggle that's now going on in the world will not be bomb

s and rockets but a test of wills and ideas,a trial of spiritual resolve,the values we hold,the beliefs we cherish,the ideals to which we are dedicated.The British people know that,given strong leadership,time,and a little bit of hope,the forces of good ultimately rally and triumph over evil. Here among you is the cradle of self-government,the Moth

er of Parliaments.Here is the enduring greatness of the British contribution to mankind,the great civilized ideas: individual liberty,representative government,and the rule of law under God.I've often wondered about the shyness of some of us in the West about standing for these ideals that have done so much to ease the ⑥plight of man and the hardsh

ips of our imperfect world.This reluctance to use those vast resources at our command reminds me of the elderly lady whose home was bombed in the blitz.As the rescuers moved about,they found a bottle of brandy she'd stored behind the staircase,which was all that was left standing.And since she was barely conscious,one of the workers pulled the cork

to give her a taste of it.She came around immediately and said,"Here now -- there now,put it back. That's for emergencies."Well,the emergency is upon us.Let us be shy no longer.Let us go to our strength.Let us offer hope.Let us tell the world that a new age is not only possible but probable.During the dark days of the Second World War,when this is

land was ⑦incandescent with courage,Winston Churchill exclaimed about Britain's adversaries,"What kind of people do they think we are?"Well,Britain's adversaries found out what extraordinary people the British are.But all the democracies paid a terrible price for allowing the dictators to underestimate us.We dare not make that mistake again.So,let

us ask ourselves,"What kind of people do we think we are?"And let us answer,"Free people,worthy of freedom and determined not only to remain so but to help others gain their freedom as well."Sir Winston led his people to great victory in war and then lost an election just as the fruits of victory were about to be enjoyed.But he left office honorabl

y and,as it turned out,temporarily,knowing that the liberty of his people was more important than the fate of any single leader.History recalls his greatness in ways no dictator will ever know.And he left us a message of hope for the future,as timely now as when he first uttered it,as opposition leader in the Commons nearly twenty-seven years ago,w

hen he said,"When we look back on all the perils through which we have passed and at the mighty foes that we have laid low and all the dark and deadly designs that we have frustrated,why should we fear for our future? We have," he said,"come safely through the worst."Well,the task I've set forth will long outlive our own generation.But together,we

too have come through the worst.Let us now begin a major effort to secure the best -- a crusade for freedom that will engage the faith and fortitude of the next generation.For the sake of peace and justice,let us move toward a world in which all people are at last free to determine their own destiny.▶ Words & Idioms① taunch : 철두철미한,견고한② prerogative

: 특권,특전③ condescension : 겸손,정중④ till : 갈다,경작하다⑤ muzzle : 입마개,재갈⑥ plight : 공경, 궁지⑦ incandescent : 눈부신,빛나는

AI 퀴즈

이 기사로 1분 퀴즈 풀기

객관식 3문항 · 즉시 채점

광고Google AdSense — 728×90

🔗 본문 속 개념

📚 함께 읽으면 좋은 기사

민주주의의 꽃? 형식적 절차?…선거를 다시 묻다
2025학년도 논술길잡이

민주주의의 꽃? 형식적 절차?…선거를 다시 묻다

선거는 민주주의의 핵심 제도로서 공적 신뢰를 형성하고 국민 주권을 실현하는 장치라는 주장이 있는 반면, 정당 공천·선거자금·제한된 선택지 등의 구조적 결함으로 인해 선거가 소수 엘리트의 권력을 정당화하는 형식적 절차에 불과할 수 있다는 비판도 제기된다. 따라서 선거의 절차적 정당성뿐 아니라 실질적 효과를 비판적으로 검토하고, 다양한 정치 참여 방식을 활성화하여 실질적 민주주의를 추구해야 한다.

2025.05.15

국내·국제 정치이슈를 쉽게 풀어낸 이야기
Book & Movie

국내·국제 정치이슈를 쉽게 풀어낸 이야기

노재봉 전 국무총리와 제자들의 대담집인 이 책은 한국 사회의 구체적 사건들을 단순한 시사 차원을 넘어 정치학적 질문으로 재구성하여 설명한다. 현실과 일정한 거리를 유지하면서 비판적으로 세상을 해석하는 정치학적 사고의 중요성을 강조하며, 역사전쟁, 세월호, 통일정책 등 한국 정치의 주요 이슈들을 사상적 차원에서 분석한다. 이 책은 추상적 이론 학습보다 현실에 밀착하여 정치학적 사고력을 기르는 실질적인 교육 방법을 제시한다.

2015.03.05

커버스토리

여론은 항상 옳은가?

여론은 대중의 분위기에 쉽게 휩쓸려 조작되거나 왜곡될 수 있으며, 이는 포퓰리즘으로 이어져 사회를 잘못된 방향으로 이끌 수 있다. 따라서 참된 민주주의를 위해서는 대중이 각자의 의견이 보편적 가치와 실체적 진실에 부합하는지 깊이 있게 숙고하고 판단해야 한다.

2006.12.20

우리에게 보편적 가치는 무엇인가
커버스토리

우리에게 보편적 가치는 무엇인가

보편적 가치란 인간의 존엄, 자유, 평등, 인권 존중 등 시간과 장소를 초월해 인류가 공통으로 공유하는 규범을 의미한다. 한국 사회의 과도한 종족주의적 민족주의는 보편적 가치를 침해할 수 있으므로, 북한 인권 문제나 국제 사건에 대해 민족감정보다는 보편적 가치를 기준으로 판단해야 한다.

2007.04.25

인문논술고사 사고유형의 기본은 '견주기와 비교'
2021학년 논술길잡이

인문논술고사 사고유형의 기본은 '견주기와 비교'

인문논술고사의 핵심 사고유형인 '견주기와 비교'는 둘 이상의 사물을 대어 유사점과 차이점을 파악함으로써 대상의 의미를 명확히 이해하는 과정입니다. 민주주의와 독재체제를 비교하는 것처럼 한 대상만으로는 알 수 없는 특질들이 비교를 통해 선명해지며, 이는 연세대, 이화여대, 경희대 등 주요 대학의 논술고사에서 중요하게 다루어지는 유형입니다.

2020.09.17

광고Google AdSense — 728×90 또는 970×250