이번 호부터는 그동안 배웠던 전개 방식들이 복합적으로 사용된 글들을 살펴보자.지난 회에서 다루었던 전개 방식(Myth & Criticism, Problem & Solution, Question & Answer)이 복합적으로 쓰인 글을 골라봤다.
이 글을 공부한 뒤에는 생글생글에 게재된 'Reading Skills'칼럼들을 찾아 '단락의 전개 방식'전체를 복습하기 바란다.
배우는 것(學)보다 중요한 것은 익히는 것(習)이다.
계속되는 복습을 통해 새로 배운 것을 익혀나가야 비로소 자신만의 지식으로 체화되는 것이다.
설교는 여기까지 하고,본론으로 들어가보자.
아래 에 따라 전체 글을 파악해보자.
주어진 글을 읽고,물음에 답하시오.
1.각 단락의 주제를 쓰시오.
2.각 단락의 전개 방식을 쓰시오.
3.글 전체를 요약하시오.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[1] It is widely believed that technological society is condemned to authoritarian management, mindless work, and equally mindless consumption. Social critics claim that technical rationality and human values are contending for the soul of modern man. This book challenges such cliches by reconceptualizing the relation of technology, rationality, and democracy. My theme is the possibility of a truly radical reform of industrial society.
[2] I argue that the degradation of labor, education, and the environment is rooted not in technology per se but in the anti-democratic values that govern technological development. Reforms that ignore this fact will fail, including such popular notions as a simplified lifestyle or spiritual renewal. Desirable as these goals may be, no fundamental progress can occur in a society that sacrifices millions of individuals to production.
[3] A good society should enlarge the personal freedom of its members while enabling them to participate effectively in a widening range of public activities. At the highest level, public life involves choices about what it means to be human. Today these choices are increasingly mediated by technical decisions. What human beings are and will become
is decided in the shape of our tools no less than in the action of statesmen and political movements. The design of technology is thus an ontological decision fraught with political consequences. The exclusion of the vast majority from participation in this decision is the underlying cause of many of our problems.
